University of Southern California The USC Andrew and Erna Viterbi School of Engineering USC
The USC Andrew and Erna Viterbi School of Engineering
Current Students
Prospective Students Current Students Alumni & Friends
Undergraduate Students
Master's Students
New Student Information
Academic Advisement
International Students
List of Department Advisors
Helpful Forms
Academic Departments & Programs
Financial Aid & Fellowships
Student Safety
Student Support & Services
Campus Life
Co-op
PhD Students
Student Organizations
Career Services
Commencement

Home > Current Students > Master's Students > Academic Advisement > Academic Probation Policy

ACADEMIC PROBATION POLICY FOR VITERBI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING MASTER’S STUDENTS
Effective Fall 2007

All USC students are expected to maintain satisfactory progress in their pursuit of an advanced degree. The Viterbi School of Engineering has established the following policy and procedures for those students who fail to meet the GPA requirements of their program of study:
  • If after attempting 6 or more units and if a cumulative GPA is less than 3.0, the student is on probation with a warning letter.  
  • If while on probation students have improved, but not yet reached 3.0 and are allowed to continue, a letter with the required GPA needed to be maintained will be sent to the student.  
  • If the GPA reaches a 3.0 or above, the student will be removed from probation.   
  • If after attempting 15 or more units (and any subsequent semester) a student will be dismissed if any of the following occur:
    • GPA falls below 2.5.
    • GPA has not improved with courses counting towards their degree enough to be on track to graduate with a 3.0 or more at the end of their program.

The University Catalogue describes the following in its section on “Academic Warning and Dismissal of Graduate Students.” Faculty advisors and departments take factors other than satisfactory grades and adequate GPAs into consideration in determining a student's qualifications for an advanced degree. A student's overall academic performance, specific skills and aptitudes, and faculty evaluations will be considered in departmental decisions regarding a student's continuation in a master's or doctoral degree program. Satisfactory progress toward an advanced degree as determined by the faculty is required at all times. Students who fail to make satisfactory progress will be informed by their department or committee chair or school dean. The faculty has the right to recommend at any time after written warning that a student be dismissed from a graduate program for academic reasons or that a student be denied readmission. Procedures on disputed academic evaluations are described in SCampus.